top of page

Bio

Dr. Chad Waxman is a licensed clinical and forensic psychologist with expertise in psychological assessment across a range of settings, including public safety, media, civil litigation, and the criminal justice system. His work frequently involves trauma-related evaluations, including cases involving Battered Woman Syndrome.

​

Dr. Waxman’s professional experience includes serving as Chief Psychologist at a police and public safety firm, working as a forensic psychologist within a jail-based competency restoration program, and acting as Program Coordinator and clinician for an outpatient therapy program serving legally involved juveniles. He has also conducted court-ordered psychological assessments for juvenile court.

​

Currently, Dr. Waxman serves as a Forensic Psychologist for the State of Colorado and holds adjunct faculty appointments in both the Master’s in Forensic Psychology and the Doctoral Program in Criminal Justice at Nova Southeastern University. He earned his Doctor of Psychology (Psy.D.) in Clinical Psychology with a concentration in Forensic Psychology from Nova Southeastern University. His pre-doctoral internship was completed with the Federal Bureau of Prisons at the Federal Correctional Institution in Fort Worth, Texas.

​

Dr. Waxman has provided therapeutic services to children and adolescents referred for diversion services, with a focus on sexually inappropriate behaviors and a broad range of clinical disorders. He has served as an adjunct instructor in psychology at several colleges and universities since 2010.

​

Before pursuing his doctorate, Dr. Waxman held several leadership roles in health promotion at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Medical. These included Program Manager for the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse, Compulsive Gambling, and Suicide; Co-Coordinator of the MedLinks Peer Advocacy Program; and Co-Founder and Co-Coordinator of the Program for Violence Prevention and Response (VPR). He also volunteered extensively with the Middle Earth Peer Assistance Program at the University at Albany, State University of New York, where he currently serves as Chair of the Alumni Board.

Forensic Services

Dr. Chad Waxman provides clinical and forensic assessment in a variety of areas including: 

  • Public Safety

  • IME (Independent Medical Evaluations)

  • Media (including reality television)

  • Civil Litigation 

  • Competency

  • Sanity

  • Mitigation

  • Interpersonal Violence

  • Trauma

  • Battered Women Syndrome. 

Headshot 2025 2.JPG
My Approach

Speaking and Workshops

Dr. Chad Waxman specializes in clinical and forensic psychological assessment across a range of domains, including public safety, media, civil litigation, and the criminal justice system. His work frequently addresses complex issues such as trauma and Battered Woman Syndrome.

​

A seasoned educator and presenter, Dr. Waxman currently serves on the faculty at Nova Southeastern University. He brings extensive experience in evaluating trauma, interpersonal violence, substance use disorders, severe mental illness, and a variety of psychological conditions.

​

Dr. Waxman has been formally recognized as an expert in both clinical and forensic psychology, with particular expertise in the areas of competency, sanity, and mitigation evaluations. He has also served as an expert witness in numerous cases involving Battered Woman Syndrome.

FAQ

How can a Forensic Psychologist like Dr. Waxman help me or my client?

 

Forensic psychologists specialize in applying psychological principles to legal questions within the courtroom. Our role is to assist the  trier of fact (judge or jury) by providing well-supported, scientifically-grounded opinions. We ensure multiple sources of information are utilized  before forming an opinion. With a deep understanding of both the legal system and clinical/counseling psychology, we offer highly specialized  expertise.

 

Examples of assistance include:

·    Assessing an individual's competency to proceed in a legal matter.

·    Opining on whether an individual suffers from Battered Women's Syndrome and how it impacted their state of mind or actions.

 

What types of courts do you work in?

​

We provide services across both civil and criminal courts:

·    Civil Courts: Services include assisting in cases involving personal injury, civil commitment, child custody, workers’ compensation, guardianship, and disability assessments.

·    Criminal Courts: Services include evaluating defendants on issues such as competency to stand trial, insanity, diminished capacity, sentencing considerations, and juvenile waiver. We also work with defendants who require treatment for restoration of competence or those acquitted by reason of insanity.

 

What does a good evaluation include, and is there a written report?

​

While a written report is not always legally required, it is typical and highly recommended for a forensic psychological evaluation.

A comprehensive report generally includes:

·    Historical Background: Relevant personal and social history.

·    Cognitive Assessment: Results from intelligence and/or achievement testing.

·    Personality Assessment: Findings from general and specific psychological testing (e.g., trauma inventories).

·    Behavioral Assessment (Mental Status): Observations of the individual's mental state.

·    Collateral Information Review: Analysis of external documents like medical records and legal documents.

·    Diagnosis and Recommendations: A concluding section that integrates all information obtained to address the specific legal question.

 

What is Battered Women’s Syndrome (BWS)?

​

Battered Women's Syndrome, a term originally coined by Lenore Walker, describes the complex psychological and behavioral characteristics of individuals in domestically violent relationships. A person suffering from BWS often experiences learned helplessness resulting from a cycle of violence. This cycle typically includes: a tension-building phase, a battering incident, a period of reconciliation or "honeymoon," and then a return to normalcy before the cycle begins anew.

The individual develops a unique awareness of the cues preceding a battering incident. This specialized knowledge is crucial in legal cases where the individual acted in self-defense, as their perception of immediate, grave danger may not be apparent to a layperson.

 

What is a Competency to Proceed Evaluation?

​

Based on the 1960 Dusky v. United States Supreme Court case, a competency to proceed evaluation ensures a defendant is able to participate in their defense.

The evaluation procedure typically assesses two factors:

1.   Whether the individual has a rational and factual understanding of the legal system and the proceedings against them.

2.   Whether they have the ability to assist their attorney in preparing their case.

The evaluation seeks to determine if a diagnosed mental condition interferes with these competency-related abilities.

 

How do you assess personal injury?

​

In personal injury cases, where a party is alleged to be psychologically harmed due to the clear responsibility of another, the court attempts to "make the person whole" through monetary damages. Dr. Waxman can assist by:

·    Determining the nature and extent of the psychological harm.

·    Opining on whether the incident caused a new mental health condition or exacerbated a pre-existing one.

·    Providing information to assist in the calculation of monetary damages.

 

Can you travel and do you work in every state?

​

Yes. Dr. Waxman holds a PsyPact Interjurisdictional License, which allows work in most participating states. For non-PsyPact states, short-term work is typically permitted with permission from the local licensing board.

 

What collateral information do you need?

​

For a comprehensive evaluation, it is critical to review all available information. This typically includes:

·    Court records and legal documents

·    Police reports

·    Medical and mental health records

·    Orders of protection

·    Text messages and correspondence

·    Witness statements

·    Any other forensic reports prepared on the case

 

Can you conduct the evaluation and/or testify online?

​

Yes, services can be conducted both in-person and remotely. The latest research indicates no significant difference in the efficacy of conducting an evaluation over video versus in-person.

Benefits of remote services often include:

·    More flexible scheduling.

·    Reduced travel fees for the expert.

·    Increased comfort for the client (if they are at home).

Additionally, many courts and correctional facilities now prefer or require video evaluations and testimony. We are happy to conduct evaluations in person if preferred.

Information collected by Chad D. Waxman, Psy.D. is for the purposes of contact only 

bottom of page